The number two of the Civil Guard denies pressures to stop the investigation of Sánchez's circle

Manuel Llamas frames in normality the internal investigations that were opened and that led to his imputation

Manuel Llamas, after arriving at the National Court

MadridNo pressure or orders not to investigate Pedro Sánchez's circle. The deputy operational director (DAO) of the Civil Guard, who is under investigation for prevarication and obstruction of justice within the framework of the Leire Díez case, is defending himself before Judge Santiago Pedraz. A witness stated that in July 2024 he urged officers to "stand aside" in judicial cases with political implications and urged them not to be proactive and to cede the initiative in pushing cases to the judges. But for more than two hours he has denied any maneuver to torpedo the investigations: he has stated that at no time did he say they should stand aside and denied any kind of pressure.

In a somewhat tense interrogation, according to sources present in the room, he has answered all questions and admitted that he does not get along well with the officers of the Central Operational Unit (UCO). In relation to the files that were opened and which were one of the main reasons why the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office requested his indictment, he has framed internal investigations as normal. In the case of the investigation into the leak of Begoña Gómez's email, he said there was a risk of some data relating to Pedro Sánchez.

Manuel Llamas arrived at the National Court at 9:40 a.m., 35 minutes before his scheduled time, accompanied by his lawyer, Edmundo Bal, who was the number two for Ciutadans in Congress in the last legislature. Nine minutes later, the director of the Civil Guard, Mercedes González, arrived, defended by Rosa María Seoane, who was one of the State Attorneys in the trial of the Procés.

Declaration postponed

It was also planned that the Director General of the Civil Guard would testify this Thursday morning, but she will have to return in 24 hours to the National Court because she has not had time: Manuel Llamas has been testifying for so long that the magistrate has been forced to postpone the second interrogation. According to the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, González facilitated an “instrumental use” of disciplinary proceedings as a “pressure mechanism” towards the police investigators of the cases surrounding Pedro Sánchez.

The director of the Civil Guard began to be in the eye of the hurricane because the so-called plumber of the PSOE boasted that she "dealt with" her and that they had a "very good relationship". The UCO discovered three meetings between the two: on September 30, 2024, December 20, 2024, and April 2, 2025. She has acknowledged two meetings, but has reduced them to a "simple contact" over an unimportant coffee. Both knew each other from when Mercedes González was the government delegate in Madrid, a position she held from 2021 to 2023.

Mercedes González arriving at the Audiencia Nacional

An “intimidating effect”

Despite the meetings between Mercedes González and Leire Díez, the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office requested their indictment, focusing on the internal files opened in 2024 and 2025, which are under suspicion. The prosecutors believe that the "real purpose" of the three was to generate an "intimidating effect" to "condition the development" of the investigations: "They became an instrument used to exert intimidation".

The document, to which ARA had access, argues that there may have been a "repeated and diverted use" of disciplinary power as a "pressure mechanism" to "hinder or alter" the "freedom" of the investigators. "We must remember the discouraging effect derived from the abusive use of disciplinary power as a form of institutional intimidation," it adds.

Likewise, it alludes to the “systematic and continuous use” of the disciplinary apparatus as a “mechanism of harassment” directed specifically “against those who conduct particularly sensitive research” and directly mentions the fragment of the sentence from the trial of the Procés in which the Supreme Court referred to “environmental intimidation”.

stats