Nigel Farage steps down as MEP to return with a 'plebiscite' between him and the Westminster establishment

LondonIn a typical maneuver of the populist that he is, Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform Party, announced this Tuesday midday that he is resigning as MP for Clacton-on-sea, a decision that will trigger a by-election in which he has already confirmed he will run again as a candidate. Farage has justified the move by stating that he wants the electors, and not "the establishment" in Westminster, to judge his conduct after the controversy generated in recent weeks by the investigations opened by Parliament into his finances.

Farage's maneuver is interpreted as a "fugida endavant" (a move to get ahead) by Farage, for reasons including that the parliamentary committee investigating him could have ended up suspending him as a deputy, which would have, however, triggered a by-election. The ongoing investigation is now suspended and would only resume if he wins back the seat.

In a press conference without questions, very combative and using the usual demagoguery, the far-right politician insisted that he has not violated any law or misused funds, while at the same time denouncing that both the media and his political adversaries have launched a campaign to discredit him. According to him, the ongoing parliamentary investigations into his economic interests, including a "personal gift" of five million pounds he received before becoming a Member of Parliament, have become a "political tool" to curb the rise of the Reform Party.

Thus, the far-right leader has presented the upcoming partial election that his resignation provokes as a plebiscite between "the people and the establishment." Once again, Farage claims to represent a people from whom he is very distant, ever since his days as a stockbroker in the City of London in the nineties, during which he built his fortune. "If I win, the voters win; if I lose, they win," he stated, ensuring that he is running again to maintain "the political revolution" initiated by his party, and that ten years ago, as leader of the UK Independence Party, he triggered the Brexit referendum and the eventual exit from the European Union.

During a speech of about fifteen minutes, Farage mixed the defense of his personal situation with a harsh attack against the Labour government, the conservatives, the media and institutions. He assured that the rules on parliamentary standards are used "selectively" against him and claimed the right of politicians to have businesses and assets, arguing that business experience is precisely what the British government lacks.

The last straw

Farage has also dedicated a significant part of his speech to denouncing the threats he claims to have suffered for more than two decades in the world of politics, since he arrived at the European Parliament in 1999. More or less, Farage has paid with the same hatred he has sown, with migrants as the primary recipients of his attacks. Presenting himself only as a victim, and not as a cause, he has recounted physical assaults, attacks on his home, and death threats. And he has explained that a significant part of the financial resources he has received are needed to guarantee his personal safety permanently, given the lack of protection offered by the Ministry of the Interior. The last straw, according to him, has been the publication by "The Times" this weekend of a photograph of the house where his daughter lives, which he considers a serious violation of his family's privacy. That is why he submits himself to the verdict of the polls in Clacton, in the southeast of England, a constituency where he won in 2024 with 46% of the votes.

Farage has also accused the government of wanting to alter electoral and party financing rules to hinder the growth of his party, which is in fact a limited company of which he himself is the main shareholder. Farage has denounced, among other measures, changes in the voting system for some elections, the reduction of the voting age to 16, and reforms on political donations, which he considers to be specifically directed against his party.

Despite assuring that he had considered leaving politics and moving to the United States to resume his professional activity, Nigel Farage has concluded that he prefers the chosen path. "I will not let Sky News or its peers decide my future," he stated, before formally announcing his resignation from his seat and his intention to compete again in the next by-election that he himself is provoking.

The announcement comes after months of scrutiny over the aforementioned gift valued at five million pounds that he received from the cryptocurrency entrepreneur and multimillionaire Christopher Harborne, a resident of Thailand. Parliamentary authorities are now investigating whether Farage should have formally declared this aid when he entered the House of Commons after the 2024 general elections. Harborne is also one of Reform UK's main donors.

The controversy intensified last weekend. An investigation published by the Sunday Times has reported another financial donation that the populist and far-right leader allegedly received, but did not declare, from George Cottrell, a financier and regular collaborator of Farage, who was convicted in the United States for electronic fraud and served a short prison sentence in 2017.

A leadership under criticism

Beyond Farage's deep dives against the British media and traditional parties, the fact is that in recent months, voices from the Reform Party itself have shown their disagreement about the leader's leadership style. And Farage's rise to the top of the polls has also highlighted the party's internal weaknesses. Several internal voices question whether the party is ready to become a real alternative government and, above all, whether Nigel Farage is willing to assume the demands that aspiring to be prime minister would entail.

The criticisms are not so much focused on Farage's political ability —considered by many of his allies one of the most effective politicians in the United Kingdom in recent decades— as on his way of steering the Reform Party. Among the reproaches are the lack of regular meetings with MPs – there are eight of them –, the absence of a chief of staff, a very weak structure for selecting candidates, and the tendency for some team members to act on their own in matters considered key.

These shortcomings have become more visible after some recent setbacks, such as electoral results lower than expected in the Makerfield by-election, competition from new forces to its right, as well as the aforementioned investigations into his personal finances. All of this has fueled the perception that Reform UK's momentum may have stalled.