While the trial for "sexual assault" of Luis Rubiales is taking place, we find the case of Mapi León, who, allegedly, during a match, touches the genitals of her rival. Both alleged "aggressors" (sic) deny, in different ways, the alleged events.
Both situations happen in a world, football, that arouses passions. Rubiales's occurs in a context of celebration. I know that the character is disliked (on his own merits) and in fact everyone points out that on the day of the events he messed around "in front of Queen Letizia" (for me the gesture is rude regardless of whether the one next to him is a queen or a maid). In any case, the "little beak"She verbalizes that she is willing to fer not the intention of being vexatious or aggressive, but rather effusive. From the intention. That day everyone embraced and fought with "the adrenaline of victory." Mapi León's case is in a context of rivalry: during a partit. The gest (which she denies) I would pretend, in other words, to be vexatori and agressiu. Parlo, of nou, of the intention. If you accuse Rubiales of having touched the sexual parts of the player in order to question the gender, what will we talk about? And if Mapi León does plant a petó not consentit to the player, to celebrate a victory, will we talk? haurà qui em remembered that Rubiales is the cap and Hermoso is the subordinate. I say "yes, but...". In l'entertainment and l'esport, de vegades, l'estrella te más can that the director.
If Mapi León were a man she would have the right to deny the facts How does she do it now? Let's think about it this way. She would be guilty with or without a video. Fortunately, whatever happens, she will not go to a trial where she will be sentenced to prison, nor will we remove her from work. I am convinced that not all women are immaculate forest fairies under male tyranny, and that (fortunately or unfortunately) we can be as bastards, rude and sexist as men.
