Railway accident

Twenty years since the Valencia metro accident: "The PP showed that it is interested in power and not victims"

The tragic accident resulted in 43 deaths and 47 injuries and the families suffered doubly due to the legal case

The former president of the Association of Victims of the Metro Accident of July 3, 2006, Rosa Garrote, at a remembrance event for the accident in an archive image.
3 min

Valencia"The PP proved that it is interested in power and not in the victims", states Enric Chulio. On July 3, 2006, he lost his wife in the tragic Valencia metro accident, the largest in Spain and the second largest in Europe. 43 people died and another 47 were injured. To the suffering from the absence of loved ones, the families had to add the pain of indifferent courts, passive media, and an indifferent citizenry. Also, a Valencian government that belittled them to the point that the then president of the Generalitat, Francisco Camps, refused to receive them. Twenty years after the tragedy, the outcome is less hurtful. "After a bitter period of many years, the support of the people and a condemnatory sentence arrived", summarizes Chulio, who has been one of the three presidents of the victims' association.

One of the elements that most struck the victims was the investigation by magistrate Nieves Molina, who dismissed the case on up to three occasions. Against the judge's will, a consent sentence was obtained in 2020. Four former directors were convicted and four others were acquitted. According to the facts declared proven, all four were aware of the "safety deficiencies" of the section. The absence of a beacon that would guarantee speed reduction on particularly dangerous curves is noteworthy. Despite being aware of this, they "omitted" their obligation to implement safety measures and "neutralize" the risks of derailment and overturning of the trains.

They were also held responsible for having allowed deficiencies in the "rolling stock", referring to the use of old wheels without the manufacturer's approval and the existence of modified windows with insufficient fastening. In fact, when the train overturned, the windows came loose, throwing passengers onto the tracks moments before the second carriage passed. Finally, they were criticized for the insufficient "training and selection" of the drivers, given that the driver had just over two months of experience.

The sentence amended the Generalitat's version, which argued that the accident was "unforeseeable and inevitable" and that the sole responsible party was the driver – who died in the accident – due to excessive speed. The train was travelling at 80 kilometres per hour, double the permitted speed on that section. But it also left many unanswered questions. "It did not clarify the suspicious disappearance of the logbook, the deletion of the metro's black box after its initial reading, and whether the tracks were damaged as some workers reported because they were quickly repaired by the Generalitat without judicial presence," complains Rosa Garrote, also former president of the victims' families association, who lost a sister in the accident.

Imposition of a narrative

One of the causes of the suffering of the families was a Valencian government that, according to journalist Vicent Peris, "covered up negligent management and mistreated the victims by accusing them of acting out of political and economic interest," highlights the co-author of the documentary website 0 responsables and the documentary "}The strategy of silence which, alongside the program Saved, provided key data for the reopening of the case. He attributes the lack of social support for the victims to the fact that "they were times of supposed economic splendor and people did not want to empathize with misfortunes". For Rosa Garrote, the key piece was the media. "It was a manipulated society, with a very conservative Canal 9," she highlights.

Twenty years later, the families have seen another Valencian government "mistreat the victims". "It is no coincidence that in both cases it is the same party in power," points out Chulio. "We thought our fight would have been useful, but we were deceiving ourselves, since it doesn't cost them votes...", laments Garrote. What has changed according to Peris is the media coverage. "Mazón has been brought down by the media. Unlike Camps, he has not been able to impose his narrative," he concludes.

The Valencian government offered jobs to the relatives of the accident victims
stats