Juan Carlos Peinado once again defends tooth and nail having had Begoña Gómez's passport withdrawn and preventing her from leaving Spain to avoid her fleeing. He does this in a report he has presented to the Madrid High Court in response to the appeal by Pedro Sánchez's wife's lawyers against the precautionary measures. He acts as if he hears nothing and "reaffirms and reiterates" all of them. Two days ago,another judge, who replaced him, prevented that Gómez traveled to Turkey for accompany Sánchez to the NATO summit, but it allowed him to go to London for his daughter's graduation. “This would not be the first time that a prime minister of a European Union member state has fled to an African continent country to avoid a corruption plot proceeding,” Peinado maintains in the document, to which ARA has had access.

Juan Carlos Peinado has shaken off the pressure and gone on vacation without resolving Begoña Gómez's request to be allowed to leave Spain. The judge who had to step in has ended up being Antonio Viejo Llorente, the same one investigating Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner. His decision has been not to allow Pedro Sánchez's wife to travel to Ankara to attend the NATO summit, which will be held from July 7 to 8, mainly because Turkey does not belong to the European Union and, therefore, he considers that a hypothetical extradition would be more complicated. However, he does allow her to travel to London to attend her daughter's graduation, which will be on Friday the 10th.

First consequences of the withdrawal of Begoña Gómez's passport. Pedro Sánchez's wife, who Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has provisionally withdrawn her document and prohibited her from leaving the country, has had to make a first request to the magistrate to lift the measure. In a written statement, to which ARA has had access, Gómez asks for permission to accompany Sánchez to the NATO summit to be held from July 7 to 10 in Ankara, Turkey, and also to take advantage of the trip to attend her daughter's graduation, which will be held in London.

There is a comparison between two fashionable judges who are currently making a name for themselves: José Luis Calama, who is investigating José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero at the National Court, and Juan Carlos Peinado, who has sent Begoña Gómez to trial after a two-year investigation. It is obvious to everyone that the way these two major media cases in which they are involved are being handled is different. Indeed, high-ranking voices from Moncloa in the corridors of Congress admit that Calama "is not" Peinado, as shown by the fact that the investigation into the former Spanish president, still in its early stages, does not have the extravagances of the indictment of Pedro Sánchez's wife. The clear distance between the two has become evident, especially in two matters: the adoption of precautionary measures and the indictment of individuals who have previously testified under oath to tell the truth. Let's go step by step.

The General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) has opened the way to open proceedings against judge Juan Carlos Peinado, arguing that the bodyguards of the president's wife, Begoña Gómez, could help her flee. Despite the media noise, history shows that sanctioning a magistrate is almost a pipe dream. Recent examples support this: in 2024, the CGPJ ended up filing the proceedings against a judge who called the Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez a "psychopath", and in February 2026, the conservative majority turned a blind eye to magistrates Eloy Velasco and Manuel Ruiz de Lara, who called the president's wife "Barbigoña", invoking freedom of expression.

Aznar's “let him who can do it do it” has been taken so much to heart by the Spanish nationalist right that a real competition is underway among guardians of the fatherland's essences to see who can strike the hardest, and if possible, definitive blow, against the communist dictatorship of Pedro Sánchez, an accomplice of Basque terrorists and Catalan coup plotters. Judge Peinado, in particular, seems to feel called to the high mission of delivering a mortal blow to perfidious sanchismo before his own retirement arrives (in September). As is public and notorious, the way he has found to do so is a classic of fascism and mafias: attacking the relatives and closest people to the enemy, defaming them, humiliating them. Mission accomplished: Judge Peinado's investigation against Sánchez's wife, Begoña Gómez, is as extravagant, irresponsible, and unacceptable as one wishes, but she will no longer be able to avoid, for as many years as she lives, that when her name is mentioned someone will associate her (want to associate her) with corruption.With so much zeal they put into it, they not only commit a coup d'état, not as soft as it is sometimes called, which is perpetrated from the very institutions of the State, but they also manage to trample on each other, and this is more unusual and more ironic. Peinado, specifically, has managed to anger the police unions, for having withdrawn Begoña Gómez's passport with the suspicion that the escorts could help her flee. The National Police, accomplices of Sanchismo! Where will we end up. Both the National Police and the Civil Guard have worked overtime to save Spain from any fumanxú that could endanger its sacred unity, only to now be pointed out as possible accomplices in an eventual escape by Begoña Gómez, one of the protagonists of the most squalid misogynistic memes circulating in patriotic WhatsApp groups. The main police unions, Jupol and SUP, are beside themselves and Minister Marlaska has summoned them. That is to say, he asked the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) to act, and the CGPJ has reprimanded Peinado, even if with a pronounced internal division. That's fine, but it would have been better if they had clarified whether Peinado is guilty of malfeasance, as stated by former Supreme Court magistrate Martín Pallín. Or even better, whether the judicialization of politics is not a serious problem for the rule of law. The arachnid sense, however, warns us that corporatism will prevail and that these debates about the magistracy will not take place, at least not publicly. A prominent member of the judicial leadership summarized it quite well: let us be left alone.The Spanish right has become so inflamed that, in order to save Spain, it doesn't mind destroying it. “Nothing happens. When we return to power, which they usurped from us, we will fix the mess,” they tell themselves. The problem is that the rule of law does not break and repair at will. Meanwhile, amnesty – another scandal of a judiciary that refuses to apply current law – looms on the horizon of the end of the legislature.

The school year has ended, tomorrow is the eve of Sant Joan and summer has begun in the midst of a heatwave, which reminds us that the prophecies about the consequences of climate change in Catalonia are unfortunately being fulfilled on time.And with all, today's news is not this, but that of judge Peinado, who this weekend has requested the passport from Begoña Gómez, the wife of the Spanish president, Pedro Sánchez. The judge considers (hold my drink) that the police escort for the Sánchez family could collaborate in an escape from Spain. See how big a mess Judge Peinado has made that this morning the CGPJ has met again to see if they open a file on him.There is no doubt that Begoña Gómez has had her passport confiscated to humiliate her and her husband, to see if she finally abandons the presidency of the Spanish government. They are after her. They want her to resign. Even more, they want her in prison. Let's see, corruption within the PSOE has already led to three of Sánchez's collaborators being imprisoned, but this is not incompatible with Sánchez being the subject of political persecution by elements of the judiciary, obedient to the Aznar-era war cry “he who can, do,” who believe they have a corporate and patriotic duty to prevent the amnesty from correcting what the Supreme Court ruled. Especially since, thanks to the amnesty, Sánchez has managed to govern despite losing the elections. And he has been president for eight years now. And it's becoming eternal for them.

The General Council of the Judiciary has decided to open proceedings to open an investigation into judge Juan Carlos Peinado, who is investigating the Begoña Gómez case, for arguing that the bodyguards of the wife of the Spanish president, Pedro Sánchez, could help her flee. This justification, for which the magistrate decided to withdraw her passport as a precautionary measure, is the reason why the judicial body has decided to open an investigation. According to the CGPJ, the judge's words may constitute a "serious lack of consideration", provided for in article 418.5 of the organic law of the judiciary. Now there will be a promoter of the investigation who, after various informational proceedings, will decide whether to definitively open the investigation or issue a resolution to close the case. Sources consulted at the CGPJ assure that there are other pending complaints against Peinado that could also be analyzed this same week.

For months, the case being investigated by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado against Begoña Gómez, wife of the Spanish president, Pedro Sánchez, has been causing unease within socialist ranks: they consider it "persecution" against Gómez for being the wife of the head of the state executive. This weekend, however, Peinado has also managed to outrage the police and part of the judiciary with the argument he used to justify the withdrawal of Gómez's passport, a precautionary measure requested by the popular prosecution led by the ultra entity Hazte Oír. The magistrate considered there was a flight risk because her escorts could help her in a possible escape. An argument that angered the police force and also put the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) on alert. So much so that this Monday the permanent commission of this body will study whether to open disciplinary proceedings against Peinado.

In a book published at the beginning of the year (On the Rule of Law), its author, Javier Cremades, warns about the fragility of the rule of law.

It is difficult to talk about lawfare in the cases that harass the PSOE due to the multitude of evidence and proof that accumulate daily, but if there is one that could serve to illustrate a textbook case of lawfare it would be the one affecting the wife of the Spanish president, Begoña Gómez. Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has led a surreal investigation, guided by evident bad faith and hostility towards Pedro Sánchez and his circle. For this reason, everyone took for granted that last Monday, when Begoña Gómez was summoned for a hearing, the judge would proceed to inform her of her indictment and the opening of oral proceedings. Surprisingly, however, five days later, the judge has not yet communicated his decision, nor has he ruled on the popular prosecution's request to withdraw her passport preventively, which unjustifiably prolongs the procedure.

While everyone was waiting for Juan Carlos Peinado to decide whether to send Begoña Gómez to trial and whether to revoke her passportdecide whether to send Begoña Gómez to trial and whether to revoke her passport, the controversial judge has made an unexpected move and has decided to open a new line of investigation in the case concerning Pedro Sánchez's wife. It is a separate piece for the crimes of prevarication and fraud against the interests of the European Union for a contract that was awarded to a company owned by Juan Carlos Barrabés. In a resolution of just over 200 words, the magistrate limits himself to citing the decree of the European Prosecutor's Office and avoids giving any minimal explanation of who intervened. It is, therefore, a very embryonic first step. Four hours after it became known, Peinado had to issue a new resolution to "clarify" that the piece is opened "solely" with respect to the businessman and, therefore, excludes the Spanish president's wife.

In recent weeks, political news in Madrid has been marked by judicial investigations. The outbreak of the Leire case and the Zapatero case have shaken the PSOE and have once again placed Pedro Sánchez in a moment of maximum weakness. And there is a repeated name that appears linked to the so-called plumber of the PSOE and the investigation into the former president of the Spanish government: Nervis Gerardo Villalobos, who was Vice Minister of Energy in Venezuela with Hugo Chávez from 2004 to 2006.

While Begoña Gómez trusts that the Madrid Court of Appeal will prevent Regulation on the creation of extraordinary chairs includes the "possibility" that, "exceptionally and for justified reasons," someone "without a labor link" to the university may be appointed as director.

With the Spanish Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, and his wife on the other side of the world, on an official visit to China, Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has closed the investigation and sent Begoña Gómez to trial. He did so this Monday in an order full of historical and literary references, unusual in legal language. As he has done throughout the investigation, in his latest order, Peinado shows great interest in linking her to her husband, despite the fact that Sánchez's role is not part of the investigation. He refers to her as "the wife of" up to four times, insisting that Gómez's professional activity experienced notable growth once Sánchez arrived at Moncloa.

The Spanish government is usually prudent when it has to comment on the judiciary, but there are two exceptions: the case of the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, in which they defended his innocence until the end, and the case of the Spanish president's wife, Begoña Gómez, who this Monday Judge Juan Carlos Peinado brought a step away from trial. This Tuesday, up to three ministers have closed ranks with Pedro Sánchez's wife and have even insinuated that there is political persecution. Moreover, they have reaffirmed that everything will be corrected by higher authorities. "We are in a state of law and not in the regime of Ferran VII," said the Minister of Justice, Félix Bolaños, alluding to the reference that Peinado made in his ruling comparing the Spanish government to an absolutist regime.

Two years after initiating the investigationthat triggered the famous five days of reflection for Pedro Sánchez, Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has decided to close the investigation into Begoña Gómez, bringing her a step closer to trial for four crimes. She is accused of influence peddling, embezzlement, business corruption, and misappropriation. The magistrate believes that her status as the Spanish president's wife served "to influence" and allowed her "access to exceptional institutional dialogues".Hours after the decision, the Spanish president has again indirectly accused the magistrate of engaging in politics. One of the key points of Peinado's thesis is the solicitation of funds for the chair that Sánchez's wife co-directed at the Complutense University of Madrid, which is at the epicenter of the case. The judge states that Gómez sought the funds "ostensibly" for the project, but that – in reality – they were to "be integrated into her personal assets".

The Madrid Provincial Court has issued another warning to Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. The judge, who has been investigating Begoña Gómez for almost two years, surprised everyone last September by deciding that the case should be tried by a jury. Pedro Sánchez's wife, his advisor at the Moncloa Palace, and businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés—with the support of the Public Prosecutor's Office—opposed this decision, and now the Madrid Provincial Court has ruled in their favor. It considers that the rulings issued by the investigating judge lack the "necessary justification" and fail to present a narrative that includes "plausible evidence," which "violates the right to effective judicial protection." The court argues that this prevents the parties from "sufficiently understanding the reasons for the decision." Consequently, it has overturned four of Judge Peinado's rulings and returned the proceedings to their previous stage.

Juan Carlos Peinado has become one of the most high-profile and controversial judges in this legislative session. His determination to investigate Begoña Gómez, Pedro Sánchez's wife, for influence peddling, business corruption, practicing law without a license, misappropriation, and embezzlement of public funds has put him in the crosshairs of the PSOE (Spanish Socialist Workers' Party) and the Moncloa Palace (the Prime Minister's residence). Other parties within the plurinational majority, such as Sumar and ERC (Republican Left of Catalonia), have also criticized him, attributing his actions to political motivations. On what basis does the Madrid investigating judge base one of the cases that are plaguing the Spanish president?

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado is keeping his case against Begoña Gómez, the wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, alive. This Wednesday, the magistrate rejected the motion to dismiss the case and made another move: he has charged another official from the Moncloa Palace, the current Secretary General of the Presidency and former Director of the Department of Technical and Legal Coordination, Judit Alexandra González Pedraz. Peinado has summoned her to testify on November 12, at which time he will inform her of the charges against her and that she is being investigated for embezzlement. One aspect of this case is the hiring of Gómez's former advisor, Cristina Álvarez, for which the magistrate has also charged Álvarez herself, Begoña Gómez, and the Spanish government's delegate in Madrid, Francisco Martín Aguirre, who previously held a position in the Presidency. The judge's argument is that the hiring of this advisor, paid for with public funds, actually served to manage Begoña Gómez's private affairs. To justify this charge, in the ruling made public this Wednesday, the judge cites the judgment in the embezzlement case. Peinado explains that embezzlement is not only that defined in Article 432 of the Penal Code, which is also "the most common," and which refers to "appropriating, with the intent to profit, or allowing a third party to do so with the same intent, public assets under one's charge." He recalls that the judgment in the embezzlement case also invoked the possibility of "eventual misappropriation," that is, when public funds are managed in a "disloyal" manner. Peinado, in this regard, cites one of the excerpts from the judgment in the trial: "The crime of embezzlement of public funds, subject to a significant reform introduced by Organic Law 1/2015 of March 30, now punishes not only misappropriation or theft, but also the disloyal administration of public funds." In this sense, he recalls that other judgments have established that this type of embezzlement "condemns the conduct of the authority or public official in charge of public assets who, breaking the bonds of fidelity and loyalty incumbent upon them by virtue of their position and abusing the powers of their office, causes harm to the assets under their administration." Thus, he adds that this type of embezzlement includes actions such as "the improper assumption of obligations," which is what he believes occurred in the Begoña Gómez case. The Foreign Ministry example

Peinado cites as an example the conviction of Raül Romeva, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, for failing to comply with the Constitutional Court's orders and preventing "the use of public funds for the illegal referendum and, above all, the uncontrolled use of public resources for this same purpose." According to the judge, the ruling in the Catalan independence trial did not condemn "the normal operation of Diplocat"—which the Minister of Foreign Affairs controlled—nor the opening of delegations abroad, but rather "the blatant disloyalty of using public funds to cover the expenses incurred as a result of a referendum."

]]>