After the investigating judge Juan Carlos Peinado has closed the investigation of the case and has left Begoña Gómez one step away from trial, it is the turn of the accusers to request the sentence. This is what the ultra platform Hazte Oír has done this Monday, which acts as a popular accuser in the proceedings along with Manos Limpias, and demands 24 years in prison for crimes of embezzlement, influence peddling, business corruption, and misappropriation. This is evident from a document to which ARA has had access and which the lawyer for Hazte Oir has presented to the court. Precisely because of the high request for a custodial sentence, it asks for the passport of Pedro Sánchez's wife to be withdrawn due to the risk of flight.

With the Spanish Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, and his wife on the other side of the world, on an official visit to China, Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has closed the investigation and sent Begoña Gómez to trial. He did so this Monday in an order full of historical and literary references, unusual in legal language. As he has done throughout the investigation, in his latest order, Peinado shows great interest in linking her to her husband, despite the fact that Sánchez's role is not part of the investigation. He refers to her as "the wife of" up to four times, insisting that Gómez's professional activity experienced notable growth once Sánchez arrived at Moncloa.

The Spanish government is usually prudent when it has to comment on the judiciary, but there are two exceptions: the case of the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, in which they defended his innocence until the end, and the case of the Spanish president's wife, Begoña Gómez, who this Monday Judge Juan Carlos Peinado brought a step away from trial. This Tuesday, up to three ministers have closed ranks with Pedro Sánchez's wife and have even insinuated that there is political persecution. Moreover, they have reaffirmed that everything will be corrected by higher authorities. "We are in a state of law and not in the regime of Ferran VII," said the Minister of Justice, Félix Bolaños, alluding to the reference that Peinado made in his ruling comparing the Spanish government to an absolutist regime.

The political chronicle continues to be a judicial chronicle, with the trials continuing against Jorge Fernández Díaz and the patriotic police leadership, against Ábalos and Koldo, and against the Pujol family.

Two years after initiating the investigationthat triggered the famous five days of reflection for Pedro Sánchez, Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has decided to close the investigation into Begoña Gómez, bringing her a step closer to trial for four crimes. She is accused of influence peddling, embezzlement, business corruption, and misappropriation. The magistrate believes that her status as the Spanish president's wife served "to influence" and allowed her "access to exceptional institutional dialogues".Hours after the decision, the Spanish president has again indirectly accused the magistrate of engaging in politics. One of the key points of Peinado's thesis is the solicitation of funds for the chair that Sánchez's wife co-directed at the Complutense University of Madrid, which is at the epicenter of the case. The judge states that Gómez sought the funds "ostensibly" for the project, but that – in reality – they were to "be integrated into her personal assets".

The Madrid Provincial Court has issued another warning to Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. The judge, who has been investigating Begoña Gómez for almost two years, surprised everyone last September by deciding that the case should be tried by a jury. Pedro Sánchez's wife, his advisor at the Moncloa Palace, and businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés—with the support of the Public Prosecutor's Office—opposed this decision, and now the Madrid Provincial Court has ruled in their favor. It considers that the rulings issued by the investigating judge lack the "necessary justification" and fail to present a narrative that includes "plausible evidence," which "violates the right to effective judicial protection." The court argues that this prevents the parties from "sufficiently understanding the reasons for the decision." Consequently, it has overturned four of Judge Peinado's rulings and returned the proceedings to their previous stage.

Juan Carlos Peinado has become one of the most high-profile and controversial judges in this legislative session. His determination to investigate Begoña Gómez, Pedro Sánchez's wife, for influence peddling, business corruption, practicing law without a license, misappropriation, and embezzlement of public funds has put him in the crosshairs of the PSOE (Spanish Socialist Workers' Party) and the Moncloa Palace (the Prime Minister's residence). Other parties within the plurinational majority, such as Sumar and ERC (Republican Left of Catalonia), have also criticized him, attributing his actions to political motivations. On what basis does the Madrid investigating judge base one of the cases that are plaguing the Spanish president?

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado is keeping his case against Begoña Gómez, the wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, alive. This Wednesday, the magistrate rejected the motion to dismiss the case and made another move: he has charged another official from the Moncloa Palace, the current Secretary General of the Presidency and former Director of the Department of Technical and Legal Coordination, Judit Alexandra González Pedraz. Peinado has summoned her to testify on November 12, at which time he will inform her of the charges against her and that she is being investigated for embezzlement. One aspect of this case is the hiring of Gómez's former advisor, Cristina Álvarez, for which the magistrate has also charged Álvarez herself, Begoña Gómez, and the Spanish government's delegate in Madrid, Francisco Martín Aguirre, who previously held a position in the Presidency. The judge's argument is that the hiring of this advisor, paid for with public funds, actually served to manage Begoña Gómez's private affairs. To justify this charge, in the ruling made public this Wednesday, the judge cites the judgment in the embezzlement case. Peinado explains that embezzlement is not only that defined in Article 432 of the Penal Code, which is also "the most common," and which refers to "appropriating, with the intent to profit, or allowing a third party to do so with the same intent, public assets under one's charge." He recalls that the judgment in the embezzlement case also invoked the possibility of "eventual misappropriation," that is, when public funds are managed in a "disloyal" manner. Peinado, in this regard, cites one of the excerpts from the judgment in the trial: "The crime of embezzlement of public funds, subject to a significant reform introduced by Organic Law 1/2015 of March 30, now punishes not only misappropriation or theft, but also the disloyal administration of public funds." In this sense, he recalls that other judgments have established that this type of embezzlement "condemns the conduct of the authority or public official in charge of public assets who, breaking the bonds of fidelity and loyalty incumbent upon them by virtue of their position and abusing the powers of their office, causes harm to the assets under their administration." Thus, he adds that this type of embezzlement includes actions such as "the improper assumption of obligations," which is what he believes occurred in the Begoña Gómez case. The Foreign Ministry example

Peinado cites as an example the conviction of Raül Romeva, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, for failing to comply with the Constitutional Court's orders and preventing "the use of public funds for the illegal referendum and, above all, the uncontrolled use of public resources for this same purpose." According to the judge, the ruling in the Catalan independence trial did not condemn "the normal operation of Diplocat"—which the Minister of Foreign Affairs controlled—nor the opening of delegations abroad, but rather "the blatant disloyalty of using public funds to cover the expenses incurred as a result of a referendum."

]]>

The Madrid Court puts Judge Juan Carlos Peinado at his feet, who wanted to send Begoña Gómez to two jury trialsThe court ruled this Thursday that the separation of the case against the wife of the Spanish Prime Minister into two parts is "premature and unfounded" and reversed it. Following this setback, there is currently only one case against Gómez, and the investigating judge must decide whether to further justify the separation of the part for embezzlement related to the hiring of Gómez's assistant at the Moncloa Palace, Cristina Álvarez, or whether to incorporate it into the main part. The ruling by which the embezzlement claim was submitted to the jury, therefore, also automatically falls.

]]>

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado wants to send the entire remainder of the Begoña Gómez case to a jury. The investigating judge issued a new order this Thursday summoning the wife of the Spanish president, businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés, and Moncloa aide Cristina Álvarez to appear in court next Monday at 5:30 p.m., as he did with the first part that was being referred to a jury. However, those involved, They sent their lawyers. "That those under investigation be duly summoned and made aware that they must necessarily appear with their lawyer," Peinado writes, after last Saturday's standoff.

]]>

We are living in such an uncertain period of political life that almost any unusual development can become credible news. And some are true. Everything that happens in the judicial sphere related to politics is part of this chapter. That an alleged case of embezzlement ends up in the hands of a jury is hard to believe. Perhaps there has been a precedent, but with little resonance. In the case of Begoña Gómez, the wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who would be the person tried by nine citizens, nothing is a coincidence. I was told that on Wednesday morning, when the news of the ruling by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, who is overseeing this case, broke, the Prosecutor's Office was full of all kinds of comments, but with the common denominator of disbelief. Especially because no one believes in coincidences anymore.

]]>

There was an unusual appointment this Saturday afternoon at the courthouse in Madrid's Plaza de Castilla. Judge Juan Carlos Peinado had summoned the Spanish president's wife, Begoña Gómez, at 6 p.m. to inform her of his decision. this week: that if she is tried, it will be by a jury, because she is accused of embezzlement of public funds. Now, Pedro Sánchez's partner has decided to renounce the investigating judge and delegate her appearance to her lawyer, former Socialist minister Antonio Camacho.

]]>

Former Spanish President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero used the term unusual Thursday morning when journalists asked him about Judge Juan Carlos Peinado's decisionsend Begoña Gómez to a jury trialIf he meant that an embezzlement case would end up being decided by nine randomly selected citizens, that's not unusual, but rather a strict application of the 1995 Organic Law on Jury Courts. Whether there was any intention behind the decision is another matter. Below, we review some key aspects of Judge Peinado's decision.

]]>

The embezzlement case against Begoña Gómez for hiring a maid at the Moncloa Palace who assisted her with private tasks will be tried by a popular court. This was determined by the investigating judge, Juan Carlos Peinado, who in a ruling issued this Tuesday agreed to transform the proceedings into a "procedure for a trial before a jury court." This does not mean that the judge will yet send Gómez, her maid Cristina Álvarez, and the former Secretary General of the Presidency of the Spanish Government, Francisco Martín, the three defendants, to trial, but legal sources indicate that the investigation is continuing. "Time will put things right. The truth is they are innocent," Spanish President Pedro Sánchez stated at a press conference at the UN, referring to the case of his wife and also that of his brother. David Sánchez, who is on the verge of trial.

]]>

It could metaphorically explain Spanish politics that Pedro Sánchez went to the cinema with Begoña Gómez on Wednesday night, while in Congress his second vice president, Yolanda Díaz, defended the reduction of the working day alone and lost. The Spanish president and his wife, who had gone to court that morning to testify before Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, went to the premiere ofThe captive, Alejandro Amenábar's new film. Sánchez is today a president captive of a part of the judiciary—he himself has opened the year by denouncing that there are judges who "play politics"—and of the seven Junts votes in Congress, and he is rowing against a media wave that collaborates with the "Whoever can make it happen" by former Spanish president José María Aznar. This week Sánchez made his TikTok debut.

]]>

The judge investigating the Begoña Gómez case, Pedro Sánchez's wife, Juan Carlos Peinado, has filed several lawsuits against politicians and journalists who have criticized his investigation. The judge believes the criticism has violated her right to honor and may constitute the crimes of slander and libel. According to the report, The Confidential And as confirmed by Efe news agency, several conciliation proceedings have already been scheduled in different first-instance courts, as a first step following the lawsuits filed by the head of the 41st Examining Court of Madrid. Among the defendants are the Minister of Transport, Óscar Puente, the former Spanish vice president and former leader of Podemos, Pablo Iglesias, as well as journalists Ernesto Ekaizer and Antón Losada.

]]>

For the fourth time since Judge Juan Carlos Peinado began investigating her, Begoña Gómez appeared in court in Madrid to testify as a suspect. Pedro Sánchez's wife answered only questions from his defense regarding the alleged embezzlement Peinado accuses her of in connection with the hiring of his advisor at the Moncloa Palace, Cristina Álvarez. The statement lasted only two minutes, and Gómez answered only three questions about Álvarez's duties. According to legal sources, Sánchez's wife explained that Álvarez sporadically helped her with private matters, in addition to managing her schedule and public activities. Just before Gómez's appearance, the advisor also appeared in court as a suspect for the same reason. She invoked her right not to testify.

]]>

Hello, how are you?

]]>

The day after the judge in the Begoña Gómez case moved to try to charge the Minister of the Presidency and Justice, Félix Bolaños, the Provincial Court of Madrid endorsed the investigation against Cristina Álvarez, an assistant to Pedro Sánchez's partner at the Moncloa Palace. The hiring of this person is precisely the reason why Juan Carlos Peinado wants to charge Bolaños. The higher court annuls Álvarez's witness statement—she was obliged to tell the truth—based on which Peinado charged her, but upholds the investigation into her for alleged influence peddling.

]]>

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado's attempt to have the Supreme Court investigate the Minister of the Presidency and Justice, Félix Bolaños, is the latest move in a controversial instruction that Moncloa does not hide from placing in the context of the lawfare. In fact, Spanish President Pedro Sánchez even filed a complaint for malfeasance against the judge.

]]>