The government says the spelling mistakes on the school vouchers distributed these days are the fault of the "subcontracted company" and that it "will not reprint them." Let's review them, first of all. There's one that I'd like to believe is a typo. Comergos by shops. Although on the keyboard the G is very far from the Ç. The second one also seems typographical. Where it should say adhered says acherits. C and D are close. The other two are major errors. Exchanges by Redeem them. Here the author doesn't understand anything about the language he's writing in. He doesn't understand that a pronoun exists. And we also find a you will find which should have an accent: you will find. That mistake is incomprehensible. No proofreader can overlook any of these four botched jobs, unless, of course, they're not a philologist or a Catalan speaker. On a computer, any robot can underline these words for you.
Several questions come to mind. First: of course, reprinting the vouchers without the four mistakes means spending money again, money that could be used for scholarships like... zzz, yes, yes. But the thing is, a cook, no matter how strict they are, when they burn the sauce, they start all over again. How can we possibly ask students not to make mistakes when there are mistakes in the school voucher for buying Whiteout? Second: Are the texts intended for students, parents, the educational community... not reviewed before going to press? And I know that sometimes the elves play tricks, but in a long text, not in half a page. And third: Do we have to outsource this voucher text to a company? Isn't there anyone in the department who could do it?
