Netanyahu travels to Washington seeking a ceasefire that will not weaken him.
With the war at a standstill and pressure mounting, the Israeli prime minister meets with Trump to try to find a way out that will allow him to retain power.
BeirutAmid a bogged-down war, a fragile coalition, and growing international pressure, Benjamin Netanyahu travels to Washington this Monday to meet with US President Donald Trump. It will be the first face-to-face meeting since the end of the war between Israel and Iran, and could become a turning point for the conflict in Gaza, where more than 57,000 people have died since October 2023, according to sources from the Gaza Ministry of Health.
The visit comes at a time of heightened tension, but also of opportunity. After months of indirect negotiations led by Egypt, Qatar, and the United States, the parties appear closer than ever to a ceasefire agreement. Hamas responded on Friday "positively" in the latest proposal. Israel, while not giving an official response, confirmed it will send a delegation to Doha to continue the talks.
The negotiated framework provides for a 60-day cessation of hostilities, exchanges of Israeli hostages for Palestinian prisoners, a massive increase in humanitarian aid, and the start of formal negotiations for a long-term political solution.
But key differences have yet to be resolved. Hamas is demanding guarantees of an Israeli military withdrawal and a permanent ceasefire, while Netanyahu insists he will not accept a truce without a clear defeat of the Islamist group.
Netanyahu has for months avoided accepting an agreement like the one now on the table. Part of that resistance has been internal. His government's far-right partners threaten to overthrow him if he gives in to Hamas. But it has also been a matter of narrative. Since the beginning of the offensive, the prime minister has insisted on the need for total victory. Recognizing that this goal is unattainable and signing a truce would mean accepting, at least partially, that Israel has not succeeded in completely dismantling its enemy.
Funeral for two children killed in Israeli bombings this Sunday in Gaza City.Mahmoud Issa / Reuters
However, something has begun to change. Senior Israeli military and intelligence officials have been warning for months that the primary objective, which is to significantly weaken Hamas, has already been achieved, and that recovering the hostages will only be possible through an agreement. Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir went further last week, stating that the army will present political leaders with operational options for the next phases, and that Hamas has been further weakened after the offensive against Iran, the main regional patron.
The meeting with Trump represents an opportunity for Netanyahu, but also a risk. The US president has put pressure on both sides to close a deal and assured that Israel has already accepted the basic outline. Through its special envoy, Steve Witkoff, the White House has reactivated a negotiation framework that contemplates the gradual withdrawal of Israeli troops, although without specifying timeframes or conditions, which allows for divergent interpretations.
Netanyahu does not openly oppose the plan, but neither does he clearly support it. His strategy has been to show his willingness to negotiate while promoting amendments that dilute the most sensitive obligations. According to diplomatic sources, his objective is to buy time and demonstrate a willingness to engage in dialogue with Washington without compromising his domestic base. In this balance, Trump can play a key role. He can pressure Netanyahu precisely to close a deal, but without making him waver at home.
A man lamenting after an Israeli attack on Gaza.Mahmoud Issa / Reuters
Internal pressures from extremists
For the Israeli prime minister, the photo with Trump in the Oval Office is not just an image of international support. It is also a message to the coalition that the concessions are part of a coordinated strategy with the United States. And that any withdrawal will be partial, gradual, and reversible. But his more radical partners, such as Ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, have already warned that they will not accept an agreement that implies ceding military control of Gaza without a total defeat of Hamas.
From the White House, Netanyahu's trip also has a broader significance. Trump seeks to consolidate an image of foreign policy leadership. After ordering attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, he now wants to show himself as the only one capable of reaching an agreement in one of the world's most persistent conflicts. The reactivation of channels with Saudi Arabia, the possibility of an opening with Syria, and the joint pressure from regional actors mean that Washington sees this situation as an opportunity for something more than a truce. It is also projected as a possible strategic reconfiguration of the region.
Meanwhile, in Gaza, the situation remains desperate. Humanitarian conditions deteriorate every day, aid corridors remain under threat, and Civilians continue to pay the price of war that no one has been able to or known how to resolve so far. This Monday's meeting in Washington will not resolve the underlying conflict. But it may be the first step toward closing it.
Israel temporarily allows humanitarian aid into northern Gaza
Israel's security cabinet has approved temporarily allowing the entry of humanitarian aid into the northern Gaza Strip, a densely populated area largely devastated by constant bombing and a shortage of food and other basic goods. At the end of June, the Israeli government decided to halt the entry of aid to the north, citing a recurring argument: Hamas seizes aid intended for civilians.
The entry of humanitarian aid is one of the key points of the ceasefire negotiations. According to several media outlets, Hamas is demanding that the United Nations be allowed to once again lead this task, a demand also made by a large part of the international community. Before the war, the UN had some 400 aid distribution points throughout the Strip, but now this work has been limited to the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an organization controlled by Israel and the United States. It only has distribution points in the south and center of the enclave and is failing to alleviate the crisis. Since the end of May, more than 400 people have died while waiting in lines to receive food, where Israeli soldiers have opened fire on civilians .
There are no aid distribution points in northern Gaza, even though approximately one million people, half of the Strip's population, live there. Thousands of people travel many kilometers every day to try to reach these areas of the Gaza Strip, although it has been found that in many cases they end up being death traps. Witnesses describe the aid distribution points as militarized zones where soldiers endanger the lives of Palestinians instead of protecting them.