The arrest of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor on Thursday is unrelated to the past rape allegations made by one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre. In fact, Scotland Yard previously dismissed that investigation. However, Roberts Giuffre's family, who reside in Australia, has been quick to release a statement. Signed by Sky and Amanda Roberts, it reads as follows: "Finally today our broken hearts have been eased to know that no one is above the law, not even royalty. On behalf of our sister Virginia Roberts Giuffre, we express our gratitude to the Thames Valley Police in the UK for the arrest of Windsor. He was never a prince to survivors everywhere. Virginia did it for you."
Former Prince Andrew of England released after 12 hours for his connection to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein
The brother of Charles III remains under investigation on suspicion of leaking confidential British government information to the financier
LondonNearly twelve hours after being arrested Thursday morning, former Prince Andrew of England – officially Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor after being stripped of his title last October – has been released from Norfolk police. Andrew was questioned about alleged misconduct in public office for leaking confidential British government information to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a statement released shortly after 7:30 p.m. local time, Thames Valley Police reported that Mountbatten-Windsor remains under investigation. At this time, no formal charges have been filed against the brother of King Charles III. The criminal proceedings are ongoing as officers analyze evidence gathered during various searches conducted throughout the day. Police are now tasked with reviewing seized documents, obtaining further evidence if necessary, taking additional statements, and examining all available material before determining whether there is sufficient basis for charges. At this stage, investigators can also seek advice from the Crown Prosecution Service, the institution ultimately responsible for deciding whether criminal charges should be filed. The final decision could take weeks or even months, depending on the complexity of the case and the volume of material to be examined.
Earthquake in the Crown
The earthquake experienced this Thursday within the Crown is closely related to the ties that Andrew has maintained for almost four decades with the financier and pedophile Jeffrey Epsteinwho committed suicide in August 2019 in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial for child sexual abuse. Andrew's arrest, the culmination of a spectacular fall from grace unseen by the British monarchy in recent centuries, took place on the day Queen Elizabeth II's third son turned 66. Police entered his Sandringham residence in Norfolk, northeast England, shortly after 8:00 a.m. this morning and took him into custody for questioning just over half an hour later. More than 20 officers searched three different addresses linked to Mountbatten-Windsor. Prior to the arrest, police officials contacted the Home Office to inform them of the details of the operation.
Early this morning, before what is undoubtedly a bombshell news story became public, Prime Minister Keir Starmer appeared on a BBC program and, regarding the Epstein scandal, stated that "no one is above the law" in the United Kingdom, although he declined to say whether he was involved. According to the official version, Buckingham Palace was unaware of the arrest. A few minutes after seven this evening, Andrew left the Norfolk County Police Station.
The news of the arrest is devastating for the British monarchy, but not necessarily fatal. And, paradoxically, it could relieve some pressure on the monarch, who has seen the affair of his wayward brother haunt the family for the past sixteen years.
Just ten days ago, Buckingham Palace issued a statement assuring that it would cooperate fully, "as it must," with any ongoing investigation, following from the analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's files published by the US Department of Justice at the end of last month. They included allegations that the former prince shared critical government information with the pedophile and others when he was the UK's trade envoy between 2001 and 2011.
The Thames Valley Police Buckingham Palace is also investigating, since early February, allegations that Jeffrey Epstein brought a woman to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. The meeting allegedly took place in 2010 at the former prince's residence, Royal Lodge, located on the grounds of Windsor Castle. The woman, who is not British, was in her early 20s at the time.
Buckingham Palace statement
Four hours after the police raid on the former prince's residence, shortly after midday, King Charles III reacted. In a relatively brief statement, and without directly addressing his relationship to the detainee, the monarch said: "I have learned with the deepest concern of the news concerning Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the suspicion of misconduct in the exercise of a public office. What follows now is the full, fair, and proper process. This, as I have said before, has our full support and our sincere cooperation. Let me state clearly: the law must take its course." The King, who was attending the opening of London Fashion Week at midday, had to listen as he arrived at the event to journalists asking him for further comments. Charles III made a couple of very brief greetings to the public and remained silent.
From the publication by the Department of Justice Of the more than 3.5 million documents in the Epstein files, the investigations surrounding Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have taken a decisive turn by focusing not only on the well-known allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking of women. linked to Virginia Giuffre's complaintbut especially in the revelations that have emerged from the extensive review of these files. The documents contain a series of emails that suggest the king's brother may have used his official position as the UK's trade envoy between 2001 and 2011 to systematically share confidential government reports with Epstein. One of the potentially most compromising cases under examination suggests that, after returning from an official trip to Asia, the former prince received detailed reports on the countries visited and, according to the digital records, forwarded them to Epstein just minutes after receiving them. This possible unauthorized transfer of official information is what has given rise to the police investigation into alleged malfeasance in the performance of his public duties. Among other things, this correspondence would indicate a deliberate misuse of state resources and documents for the benefit of a private communication channel, in this case with the American financier.
The discovery and analysis of the documents has put increasing pressure on the already discredited figure of the king's brother. The revelations demonstrate his continued lies in her BBC television interview from late 2019especially regarding his level of friendship with the financier and details about his contacts with victims of abuse and sex trafficking. The gravity of the situation for former Prince Andreu, and by extension for the Crown, due to an alleged cover-up, whether by action or omission, is reflected in the simultaneous searches carried out at his Norfolk residence and the Royal Lodge in Berkshire. Officers will most likely confiscate computer equipment, files, and photographs that could serve as documentary evidence of his activities.
Conversations with the Prosecution
According to information that is being released practically in real time in parallel with the arrest, police officers have already held conversations with different specialists from the Crown Prosecution Service. Yesterday, West Midlands Police confirmed they were analyzing private flights arriving at and departing from Birmingham and Stansted airports for potential sex trafficking offenses. Surrey Police have also urged anyone with information to come forward regarding allegations of the same crime and sexual assaults from the 1990s documented in Epstein's files.
The deputy chief constable of Thames Valley Police issued a statement saying: "Following a thorough assessment, we have opened an investigation into the allegation of misconduct in a public office. It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate the case, and we will provide updates as appropriate." The former prince's name is not mentioned, a standard formal procedure, but this cannot conceal the identity of the person arrested.
The arrest of a member of the British royal family is unprecedented. The arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor marks an unprecedented turning point in the modern history of the British monarchy, as it represents the detention of the closest relative of a monarch since the trial of Charles I in the 17th century. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may initially be held for 24 hours while the police conduct various searches. This period could be extended to 96 hours. Although the suspect has always denied any wrongdoing, despite the growing body of evidence, the nature of the charge of misconduct in public office is extremely broad and can carry very severe penalties, including life imprisonment in the most serious cases of treason. Currently, eight different police forces are investigating ramifications of human trafficking and other inappropriate conduct, and the case is now entering an active judicial phase that opens the door to a possible public trial that could shake the foundations of the royal institution. According to legal experts analyzing the situation in the British media, police are not always obligated to arrest a suspect. Often, a "voluntary interview" by appointment is an option. However, in the case of the former Duke of York, the authorities decided that an arrest was necessary. This decision suggests that the investigation has moved beyond the preliminary stages of gathering statements and now requires stricter controls to access key evidence, such as computer equipment and documents. It is speculated that the British government and senior police officials were informed of this operation beforehand, given its scale and significance. "It is inconceivable that an action of this magnitude could have slipped under the government's radar," sources close to the case told the BBC. However, the same broadcaster has stated that Buckingham Palace was not informed beforehand.