Jair Domínguez, to the judge: "The punch in the mouth was a metaphorical expression"
Ultras ask for two years in prison for the comedian for alleged hate crime
This browser does not support the video element.
BarcelonaThe comedian Jair Domínguez faced this morning the trial promoted by Vox against him. The far-right party reported him for an alleged hate crime for having said that "fascism" and "nazis" are fought with a
the Barcelona Court issued an arrest warrantLast week, the Barcelona Court issued an arrest warrant for Domínguez to notify him of the trial date. In fact, Domínguez explained on X that the Mossos d'Esquadra had tried to locate him at a house where he no longer lives and also at his ex-wife's house.
Domínguez stressed that his public image in the media is an "amplified version" of himself, a "humorous and exaggerated version" that is easily identified by listeners:
Vox's prosecution, on the other hand, considered that his words were indeed "forceful" in favor of violence and that they were directed against their voters,
Vox not only directed its accusation against the comedian, but also against the Catalan Corporation of Audiovisual Media (CCMA), to whom it requested a fine. Finally, the court has prevented this second accusation because during the investigation phase, no legal representative of the CCMA – now 3Cat – was questioned, and therefore, it could not be accused as a legal entity. Nor did Vox benefit from the fact that the then director of Catalunya Ràdio, Saul Gordillo, had testified.
The Mossos saw "sarcasm and irony" in the statements
Domínguez's controversial statement was made after the Catalan elections in which Santiago Abascal's party entered the Parliament with 11 deputies: "Fascism and Nazis are fought with a punch in the mouth. There are no half measures, you don't negotiate with fascism," he said. Contrary to what Vox defends, however, the Mossos also saw no crime, as explained in the same trial by the agent tasked with analyzing the statements, the only witness in the trial.
In the police report, as recalled, the conclusion was reached that Domínguez's "monologue" was delivered in a tone of "sarcasm and irony" and that, after his words, there was no "violent reaction" or "relevant event" that could be related. The agent highlighted that, despite the context of "polarization" at the time, the statements were made on a program with "great audience" with "people of different political thoughts," and added: "We don't believe that people who commit violent acts listen to him".
His lawyer, Jaume Alonso-Cuevillas, also stated upon leaving the trial that the statements for which Domínguez is being tried "are protected by freedom of expression, which includes humorous and sarcastic speeches". "We shouldn't have gotten this far, it's an absurd trial," he added. Cuevillas recalled that the hate crime of which the comedian is accused is designed to protect vulnerable groups, and Vox is not one of them.
The Barcelona Court is judging the case after last week's soap opera following the arrest warrant issued by the judge for the comedian to appear in court. Domínguez reacted with perplexity: "I'm at home quietly and they can't find me," he said, making it clear that he didn't need the summons to remember he had the trial, which has been seen for sentencing. Awaiting the court's conclusions, Domínguez had already made it clear a few days ago that he does not regret his comments about the ultras. "I would do it again [...] We keep saying that violence is not an option, but they don't stop using it against us. Perhaps we shouldn't turn the other cheek," he argued on RAC1.