The bureaucracy has become a serious problem Since the administration decided to transform the collection of a seemingly insignificant bill, or any other similar procedure, into a long ordeal with an uncertain end, I would like to make some suggestions to help resolve this.
First, a panel of experts would need to be convened to establish the legal framework for the debureaucratization process (Sustainable Transparency Commission, or STC). However, to select the candidates, a consultative commission would first be necessary. This commission would be independent of the government, have its own stable structure and organizational chart, and operate under agreed-upon bylaws (Platform for the Responsible and Sustainable Selection of Candidates for the Debureaucratization Process, or PSRSCPD). Twelve highly qualified legal experts—six men and six women—not affiliated with any political party would be responsible for drafting these bylaws (Auxiliary Commission for Transparency in Debureaucratization, or ATCD). Of course, a subcommittee would first need to be created to verify the legal experts' lack of ties to political groups through individual investigations. The Verification Subcommittee would not be dependent on the Responsible and Sustainable Selection Platform and would be composed of experts nominated from the various Catalan universities, who would first need to have obtained the Homologation Proficiency Certificate (CSH), issued by a special commission (Interdepartmental Commission for the Issuance of Certificates of the Parliament). To request the CSH, the application from the Documentary Requests Commission (CPD) would need to be downloaded with a one-time code generated by the University Personnel Identification Program (PIPU), obviously with a digital signature and a facial recognition system to guarantee the complete security and transparency of the process. To access PIPU, a specific application would need to be installed from the CIECH website. In the case of biometric identification, and considering the possibility of fraud, a certificate issued by a plastic surgeon would need to be provided stating that the candidate's facial features have not been modified in any previous operation. Naturally, this certificate would have to be issued by accredited professionals (access to PIPU). This would only be possible by providing the professional registration number of these doctors selected by the Interdepartmental Commission for Issuing Certificates of Qualification. Once the Certificate of Qualification is obtained, the administrative process for the Auxiliary Commission for Transparency in Debureaucratization would begin, without which it would not be possible to establish the Responsible and Sustainable Candidate Selection Platform. Finally, the CTS, or Commission for Sustainable Transparency, could then be formed. Once established, a legal subcommittee would be essential, specifically tasked with adapting the lines of action to European regulations, particularly: 1) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of personal data; 2) Regulation (EU) 1049/2001 on public access to documents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. 3) Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market, which facilitates freedom of establishment and provision of services; 4) Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement, which regulates administrative tendering procedures; and 5) All Community environmental protocols.
To contact the Commission for Sustainable Transparency (CTS) to simplify and expedite procedures, citizens should register with the @dministración @miga service. This requires obtaining a disposable login code for the Empowered Citizens website, which is managed by Section B of the Auxiliary Commission for Transparency and Debureaucratization. Once registered with the @dministración @miga virtual service, citizens should submit the necessary documentation to begin the process. This will allow the Documentary Evaluation Subcommittee (SAD) to review each case, with a resolution expected within approximately ten months. If the documentation is incomplete or incorrect, users will be charged a €300 review fee.
Bureaucracy has become a serious problem, and what we propose is just a small first step toward solving it. The second step would consist of...
