Nine out of ten dentists recommend sugar-free gum, the ad said, and that made it inevitable to want to know who was recommending sugar-free gum, to ask if they had any motive beyond securing a comfortable portfolio of clients with cavities. The same thing happens with war. Common sense dictates that it's wrong to rejoice, but there's always one newspaper in ten that thinks otherwise and enjoys the sound of bombs. And that honor was held today, Monday. The reason, who has made a display of articles and an editorial that is optimistic to the point of naivety: "That a criminal regime does not have or have at its disposal a definitive arsenal must be considered a victory for the free world and a step that strengthens world peace."
Not even The World, which would not be a header precisely wokeTrump scolds for his "warmongering expansionism that exponentially increases the risk of a large-scale war in the Middle East and plunges the entire world into instability."Abc, which criticizes the US president because he "flagrantly contradicts one of the founding promises of his project: no more wars." And it reminds him that "wars are known when they begin, but not when or how they end." The Planeta newspaper therefore applauds the unilateral action. Perhaps it does so because it believes it is putting pressure on Sánchez, whom it does not mention in its editorial text, but does say that "pacifist isolationism is a terror in a global world." Be that as it may, the result is that the media once again appears fascinated by authoritarian figures and banging their fists on the table. Even when the one who sets the balance in motion is a figure as unpredictable and insubstantial—beyond his own interests in the blink of an eye—as Donald Trump.
