The contracting judgment of the first part...

...will be considered the contracting judgment of the first part. We have to take the Supreme Court's decision with a Groucho Marxist's perspective, because the prevailing suspicion is that the Attorney General's disqualification was decided from the outset, and that the dozens and dozens of pages written to justify it are just like the film's very long contract: blah, blah. Of course, this charade allows each media outlet to highlight the part that interests them, to the point of suggesting one thing and its opposite. Because when The Country The headline features a quote from the court proceedings stating that "the accused or someone in his circle delivered the email." What this underscores is that the court, with its conservative majority, has assumed that perhaps it wasn't him who leaked the information, but rather a subordinate (and therefore opens the door to the possibility that this unidentified individual acted independently). Let's also remember that journalists from the Prisa group have repeatedly stated that they did not receive the information from García Ortiz.

On the other side of the Rubico, they want to certify the guilt of the now former Attorney General: "He unjustifiably broke the duty of confidentiality" is the excerpt highlighted.ABCwhere guilt is pointed out as unequivocal. In the case ofThe WorldWhat's being emphasized is that the evidence against him is "solid, coherent, and conclusive," which is practically meaningless, because any sentence is supposed to be based on these pillars. In fact, the need to insist... that's my point. And finally, The reason Leave the dead man alone, because this wasn't all about García Ortiz, but about tightening the noose around Sánchez, which is why they write on their front page that "the Supreme Court points to a cover-up coordinated with Moncloa." I think that if they keep scrutinizing what the ruling says (and doesn't say), they'll finally find proof concluding that Pedro Sánchez killed Kennedy.