On Thursday night Mariano Rajoy was the star guest ofThe anthill. The audience of the programme showed an exalted enthusiasm for his visit. The claca celebrated all his jokes and answers with a suspicious immediacy and passion. Throughout the interview, Pablo Motos addressed him with a familiarity that was very inappropriate, especially because Rajoy always addressed him as "usted". This discordance in tone was striking and revealed Motos's usual need to show himself close to power. The questions he asked him to promote his collection of presidential speeches also revealed his unconditional and servile devotion. Motos wanted to please him, but also use him to attack Sánchez's government. He was looking for someone who would endorse all the criticisms that he usually launches from his programme whenever he has the opportunity.How would you solve the housing problem?", it will demand. The information will be required with the concern of explaining to the audience that that response was the right one. The problem is that Motos obliges that Rajoy is going to be president anyway, and that he will have the right moment to fix the problem when he had to. PP es vivia millor. Li feia las ques como se fos el'oracle dels Déus, prescindint la biaix en l'focament. Motos interpreted the six answers with examples of the most irrefutable logic, sense that in that discourse there was an ideological charge. democrats that He assured that he had lost and had examples of his good government. Finally, everything is going to win a medal for the management of the disaster of the Prestige, in contrast to what happened with the DANA. Motos considered him a brilliant speaker, although, in his explanations on the same programme, Rajoy was more boring and made outdated jokes.
The plush ants, Trancas and Barrancas, appeared to ask him advice for the new generations of politicians. A curious triplet. The questions from the rag dolls were better than those from Motos.Can a president last if he has angered the country's most important businessmen?It is ironic that this question was asked on an Atresmedia channel, the PP's favourite.
Which kids should be pixelated?
Musk, as a father-in-law, was the headline in Telenotícies to describe the tycoon's appearance at the White House with his son on his shoulders to speak to the media. The image of familiarity and trust reinforced the idea of the businessman's impunity. The father of the child was the one responsible for exposing him to the press. All the news programmes in Spain reproduced his image in its entirety. And surely the same thing happened all over the world. On the other hand, in Marc Giró's section in theIt's happening The decision was made to pixelate the child's face. Perhaps it was no longer necessary, but doing so had a symbolic value: that of establishing a critical view of this staging.
