The SpanishIt offers a topic for insiders. It's titled "The day the former head of SEPI and Leire had lunch with Cerdán three years before the 'plumber' claims to have met him." You have to be very clear about the dramatis personae You have to read the whole series to understand these four lines overflowing with names. But the idea is clear: Leire Díaz lied. And the photograph does indeed show the three of them sharing a well-set table, with neatly folded cloth napkins, a basket of bread rolls, and a small bottle of oil. All three are looking at the camera for posterity. All very well, if it weren't for that caption: "Leire Díez, Santos Cerdán, and Vicente Fernández around a table, in an image generated with artificial intelligence."
Come on, no. Not even explaining it in a caption, which who knows who will read—because the image, apparently, needs no clarification—justifies creating an image that looks real but depicts a nonexistent scene. If they were going to do it, all they had to do was scatter a few envelopes with bundles of cash on the table and, in the background, have Koldo grabbing a prostitute by the arm and Tito Berni cheerfully handing out packets of drugs and Viagra to the crowd. The limit is imagination. Or a lack of scruples. The minimum agreement with the reader is that the photographs show reality without alteration. There may be the photographer's perspective, which in turn influences the reader's through a specific framing or lighting, but creating scenes and dioramas is a boundary that, certainly,The SpanishPedro J. Ramírez's comments wouldn't be acceptable if the person affected were, for example, Isabel Díaz Ayuso. He himself, who was the victim of shameful sexual blackmail, should realize the low blow it is to pick up the crayons of AI and start creating imagined still lifes.
