Ed Sheeran in 'The Revolt'.
Periodista i crítica de televisió
2 min

On Tuesday, on La 1, The revolt It began as usual. David Broncano appeared on stage and the audience spurred him on with shouts and comments. The presenter, after playing the timpani, laughed at the contributions of the most broke: ""Alcoholic," one of them tells me! It's just that... the kind of insult..."The show, as always, was sensitive to social issues. The crew joked about the recording time. They revealed it was a Saturday morning, because that was when their guest, singer Ed Sheeran, was able to be on."Five hours ago I was at home getting laid!", Broncano pointed out. In post-production, however, they added a whistle to cover up the rudeness. They used the same method to cover up a few"bitch" from his colleagues.

It's ridiculous that public television accepts the narrative but censors it with this patch. It's hypocritical and incoherent to phonetically hide the swear word and keep the communicative context intact. The effect is totally opposite: the "beep" acts as an amplifier of the context.

The interview with Ed Sheeran was carried out with camaraderie and naturalness.Why do you think that when we eat something spicy our asses sweat?", Broncano asked him. Sheeran seemed to have a good time despite the strangeness caused by that stage full of junk and the chaotic informality. One of the games that the presenter proposed consisted of making him choose between two contrasting bad options: "Would you rather be eating macaroni and find a pussy hair or be eating pussy and find a macaroni?" Sheeran, after covering his eyes after the question, gave a reasoning about his preference and provoked applause from the audience. At the end of the program, after a musical performance, the singer congratulated Broncano because in the United Kingdom these types of comments were unthinkable on television and it seemed very good to him that they exist.

In their desperation to compete, the networks have used this resource to capture the younger audience segments, yes, led by individuals over forty. change, let the veteran sector do it bro who struggle to appear eternally adolescent. Because an aura of irreverence has been built around male immaturity. Confusing vulgarity with wit and modernity results in very outdated primitive spectacles.

stats