Nigel Farage steps down as MEP to return with a 'plebiscite' between him and the Westminster establishment

LondonIn a typical populist move, Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform Party, announced this midday that he is resigning as MP for Clacton-on-Sea, a decision that will trigger a by-election in which he has already confirmed he will stand again as a candidate. Farage has justified the move by stating that he wants the voters, and not "the establishment" in Westminster, to judge his conduct after the controversy generated in recent weeks by the investigations opened by Parliament into his finances.

Farage's maneuver is interpreted as a forward flight, for reasons including that the parliamentary committee investigating him could have ended up suspending him as a deputy, which would have nevertheless caused a partial election. The ongoing investigation is now suspended and would only resume if he wins the seat again.

In a press conference without questions, very combative and in which he used his usual demagoguery, the far-right politician insisted that he has not violated any law or misused funds, while at the same time denouncing that both the media and his political adversaries have launched a campaign to discredit him. According to him, the ongoing parliamentary investigations into his economic interests, including a "personal gift" of five million pounds he received before becoming a Member of Parliament, have become a "political tool" to curb the rise of the Reform Party.

Thus, the far-right leader has presented the future partial election that he provokes with his resignation as a plebiscite between "the people and the establishment." Once again, Farage claims to represent a people from whom he is very distant, since the time he was a stockbroker in the City of London in the nineties, during which he built his fortune. "If I win, the voters win; if I lose, they win," he stated, assuring that he is running again to maintain "the political revolution" initiated by his party, and that ten years ago, as leader of the UK Independence Party, he triggered the Brexit referendum and the exit from the European Union.

During a speech of about fifteen minutes, Farage mixed the defense of his personal situation with a harsh attack against the Labour government, the conservatives, the media and institutions. He assured that the rules on parliamentary standards are used "selectively" against him and claimed the right of politicians to have businesses and assets, arguing that business experience is precisely what the British government lacks.

The last straw

Farage has also dedicated a significant part of his speech to denouncing the threats he claims to have suffered for more than two decades in politics, since he arrived at the European Parliament in 1999. More or less, Farage has paid with the same hatred he has sown, with migrants as the primary recipients of his attacks. Presenting himself only as a victim, and not as a cause, he has recounted physical assaults, attacks on his home, and death threats. And he has explained that a significant part of the financial resources he has received are needed to guarantee his personal safety on a permanent basis, given the lack of protection offered to him by the Ministry of the Interior. The last straw, according to him, has been the publication by The Times this weekend of a photograph of the house where his daughter lives, which he considers a serious violation of his family's privacy. That is why he submits himself to the verdict of the polls in Clacton, in the southeast of England, where he won in 2024 with 46% of the votes.

Furthermore, Farage has accused the government of wanting to alter electoral and party financing rules to hinder the growth of his party, which is in fact a limited company of which he himself is the main shareholder. Farage has denounced, among other measures, the changes in the voting system for some elections, the reduction of the voting age to 16 years, and reforms on political donations, which he considers to be specifically aimed against his party.

Despite assuring that he had considered leaving politics and moving to the United States to resume his professional activity, Farage has concluded that he prefers the path chosen. "I will not let Sky News or its equivalents decide my future," he stated, before formally announcing his resignation from his seat and his intention to compete again in the next by-election he himself is causing.

The announcement comes after months of scrutiny over the aforementioned gift valued at five million pounds that he received from cryptocurrency entrepreneur and billionaire Christopher Harborne, a resident of Thailand. Parliamentary authorities are now investigating whether Farage should have formally declared this aid when he entered the House of Commons after the general elections of 2024. Harborne is also one of the main donors to Reform UK.

The controversy intensified last weekend. An investigation published by the Sunday Times has denounced another financial donation that the populist and far-right leader would have received, but not declared, from George Cottrell, a financier, a regular collaborator of Farage, who was convicted in the United States for electronic fraud and who served a short prison sentence in 2017.

Leadership under criticism

Beyond Farage's deep dives against the British media and traditional parties, the fact is that in recent months voices from the Reform Party itself have shown their disagreement over his leadership style. Farage's rise to the top of the polls has also highlighted the party's internal weaknesses. Several internal voices question whether the party is prepared to become a real alternative government and, above all, whether Nigel Farage has the will to assume the demands that aspiring to be prime minister would entail.

The criticisms are not so much focused on Farage's political ability – considered by many of his allies one of the most effective politicians in the United Kingdom in recent decades – as on his way of leading the Reform Party. Among the reproaches are the lack of regular meetings with the MPs – there are eight of them – the absence of a chief of staff, a very weak structure for selecting candidates, and the tendency for some team members to act on their own initiative on issues considered key.

These shortcomings have become more visible after some recent setbacks, such as electoral results lower than expected in the partial election of Makerfield in the partial election of Makerfield and the competition from new forces to his right, in addition to the aforementioned investigations into his personal finances. All this has fueled the perception that Reform UK's momentum may have stalled.