Total Destruction III

The technology of war (what they call "the arms race") has gone so far that, paradoxically, wars are more "homemade" than ever. Iran was about to manufacture nuclear weapons, figure, and that's why it's being attacked, figure. Iran could defend itself from the attack by finalizing and using the nuclear weapons that were the target of the attack, but it doesn't because then the western part of the world would have been destroyed, and perhaps the eastern part, to some extent. This war will last and last, and there will be dead and maimed soldiers, destroyed buildings, orphaned children, hunger, and disease.

In this situation, which will be no different from the war in Ukraine, Donald Trump has made one of those tweets he makes on his social network, which is the ideal place to terrify enemies when you're playing paintball. He says that Iran is the "loser"of the Middle East, and has threatened it with 'total destruction.'

Linguistically, the expression is very interesting. He could threaten destruction, and we'd understand each other. He could threaten partial destruction, and that would mean, for example, sparing the major offenders. But no. He threatens total destruction. Donald Trump has achieved an undeniable feat." Air Force Onewhere the president, a consensus figure played by a classic heartthrob like Harrison Ford, must be saved as a symbol of a powerful and free nation. Since Donald Trump, any film starring a president "of the nation" will be a comedy, in the style of those starring the late, great Leslie Nielsen.