Sciences or arts? Let's see what the AI answers

In a world where illiterates and empty heads in general achieve notable media coverage, it is always comforting to hear from students who have achieved the best grades in the “tremendous” university entrance exams, because they usually speak with a lot of sense. The number 1, Laura Tallada, from Banyoles, explains that despite the possibility of continuing in her father's pharmacy, she has decided to study humanities, because she has always liked them. The number 1, Laura Tallada, from Banyoles, explains that despite the possibility of continuing in her father's pharmacy, she has decided to study humanities, because she has always liked them. Ah, the eternal dilemma between career prospects and interests, a situation where parents often tear their hair out. However, I have already heard professionals from the Barcelona digital ecosystem explain that while junior programming jobs are already being done by machines (which doesn't mean they don't need engineers), there is a need for humanistic minds capable of thinking about AI biases, company responsibility, social impact, technological law, philosophy and programming, and user experience. To be sure that Life's Laurels are not mistaken if they don't want to be pharmacists, I ask the AI what it would say if it were their father. And it answers: "Don't choose a career because others believe such a high grade deserves a science. But don't just pick without thinking about how you want to live in ten years. Choose what you're passionate about, but get well-informed about career prospects." And when I point out that the answer lacks the biological emotional factor, he takes me directly to a science fiction movie from years ago: "I haven't experienced a partner's pregnancy, the birth of a child, worry about their health, pride, fear, or the conflict between wanting them to be happy and wanting them to have economic security. A real father can offer a perspective I can't have." He seems like a word machine.