When will the AI-powered Nutriscore be available?

The Nutri-Score system—on yogurts, jars of hummus, and Bollycao pastries—has numerous shortcomings, but it provides a quick visual indication of whether the product you're holding up in front of the supermarket shelves is more or less nutritious. Now, the British progressive Institute for Public Policy Research proposes that artificial intelligence systems include a similar classification in their responses, allowing users to know whether the information they receive comes from reliable sources, such as peer-reviewed scientific articles or accredited media outlets, or from less reputable sources.

I think this is a timely measure. First, because unlike with food, where everyone is more aware that cauliflower is more nutritious than Oreo cookies, in the case of information, there isn't enough media literacy to easily distinguish between protein and bad cholesterol. But there's an even greater benefit. Adopting this classification would also require greater explicitness regarding sources, which is the other major problem with AI: they want to instill the idea that information is an undifferentiated and free flow that magically emanates from the digital void. In fact, the Institute not only demands Nutri-Score, but also compensation for publishers. Ultimately, they border on piracy, stealing raw material without clear compensation. However, as reasonable as it may seem, I believe this proposal will not succeed because it would imply assuming that a considerable portion of AI responses are generated using material of dubious origin. In short, it has more "E-"s than the worst processed pastries. I wonder if Google, the other major threat from AI, will finally back down and seriously negotiate with publishers to form a united front.