<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ara in English - Agustín Fernández Mallo]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/etiquetes/agustin-fernandez-mallo/]]></link>
    <description><![CDATA[Ara in English - Agustín Fernández Mallo]]></description>
    <language><![CDATA[es]]></language>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link href="https://en.ara.cat/rss-internal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Can artificial intelligence make us better writers?]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/culture/can-artificial-intelligence-make-us-better-writers_130_5894708.html]]></link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/97e105d7-bd33-4b57-802c-6bbf6e58d7a4_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0_x1248y776.jpg" /></p><p>A few days ago, two well-known authors, suspicious of the creative abilities of generative artificial intelligence, put it to the test and the result was not what they expected. "We asked it to write a one-paragraph story in a baroque style with the sole premise that it had to feature a dog walker, and the story was coherent and not bad at all, but then we asked it if it could rewrite it with our particularities as authors, without giving it any other clue, and it did it even better," comments <a href="https://llegim.ara.cat/actualitat/irene-pujadas-obsessiona-pel-massa-especials_1_5271890.html" >Irene Pujadas</a>, winner of the latest Finestres prize with <em>La intrusa</em> (L'Altra, 2025) and one of the participants in this experiment. The other was <a href="https://llegim.ara.cat/actualitat/mariana-enriquez-amics-hem-passat-parlar-on-compravem-coca-ingressem-pares_128_4961897.html" >Mariana Enriquez</a>. "We weren't satisfied with what the AI achieved and we wanted to know how it had decided what choices it made in each case –continues Pujadas–. It replied that, in Mariana's case, it had set out to write a story with a touch of mystery that was not found in the characters, but rather related to the spaces where it took place, as she usually does in her fiction. In my case, connecting it to my literary world, the dogs in the story were taking an emotional management course and everything ended up having an absurd bureaucratic touch". </p>]]></description>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordi Nopca]]></dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/culture/can-artificial-intelligence-make-us-better-writers_130_5894708.html]]></guid>
      <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2026 06:11:33 +0000]]></pubDate>
      <media:content url="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/97e105d7-bd33-4b57-802c-6bbf6e58d7a4_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0_x1248y776.jpg" type="image/jpeg"/>
      <media:title><![CDATA[Melcior Comes, Mariana Enriquez, Agustín Fernández Mallo, Alicia Kopf, Patricio Pron and Irene Pujadas. (from top left to right and from bottom left to right)]]></media:title>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/97e105d7-bd33-4b57-802c-6bbf6e58d7a4_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0_x1248y776.jpg"/>
      <subtitle><![CDATA[The recent controversy following the publication of two novels written in collaboration with artificial intelligence without attributing it opens a debate about the use of this technology for creative purposes. We ask authors such as Melcior Comes, Mariana Enriquez, Agustín Fernández Mallo, Alicia Kopf, Patricio Pron and Irene Pujadas about their relationship with this new tool.]]></subtitle>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
