<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ara in English - sights]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/etiquetes/sights/]]></link>
    <description><![CDATA[Ara in English - sights]]></description>
    <language><![CDATA[es]]></language>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link href="http://en.ara.cat:443/rss-internal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA["Every monument is undemocratic by definition, a way of saying: 'It's mine'"]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/culture/every-monument-is-undemocratic-by-definition-way-of-saying-it-is-mine_1_5756442.html]]></link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/e8302439-9538-4c3a-a535-ddb4077f69aa_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg" /></p><p>What do we do with monuments, especially <em>unjust ones</em>? This was the question being asked this Tuesday in the last session of the season of the Pedralbes Dialogues, organized at the Pedralbes Monastery with the collaboration of ARA, moderated by Antoni Bassas, and under the intellectual direction of the philosopher Daniel Gamper. To answer the question, a historian with a torrential discourse and forceful affirmations, Daniel Rico, professor of art history at the Autonomous University of Barcelona and author of an essay on the subject: <em>¿Quién teme a Francisco Franco?</em> (Anagrama, 2024). For Rico, the issue is not simple: "Hiding monuments in a warehouse or leaving them as they are without doing anything are, in fact, two extreme expressions of the same problem: not wanting to settle accounts with the past. Removing them means getting rid of the past; and doing nothing is turning your back on it. But if you have a trauma, what you need to do is analyze it and confront it."</p>]]></description>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavi Serra]]></dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/culture/every-monument-is-undemocratic-by-definition-way-of-saying-it-is-mine_1_5756442.html]]></guid>
      <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Jun 2026 19:43:03 +0000]]></pubDate>
      <media:content url="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/e8302439-9538-4c3a-a535-ddb4077f69aa_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg" type="image/jpeg"/>
      <media:title><![CDATA[Pedralbes Dialogues (Monuments): Antoni Bassas with Daniel Gamper and Daniel Rico discuss what to do with unjust monuments.]]></media:title>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/e8302439-9538-4c3a-a535-ddb4077f69aa_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg"/>
      <subtitle><![CDATA[The historian Daniel Rico reflects at the Pedralbes monastery on coexistence with uncomfortable memory]]></subtitle>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Want to get closer to the Trevi Fountain? It's two euros.]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/culture/want-to-get-closer-to-the-trevi-fountain-it-s-two-euros_1_5636254.html]]></link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/9229ecb2-0e73-465d-80ee-8ea85cb9ecef_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg" /></p><p>Approaching the Trevi Fountain and taking the typical photo with the coin toss now costs 2 euros. As of today, it's another of Rome's historic sites that now charge admission. Until now, queuing was already necessary because tourist access to the monument was controlled, but this Monday a toll booth was set up. Mobile barriers surround the monument that symbolizes Oceanus driving a shell-shaped chariot. Visitors can still enter the square, but to go down the steps and approach the edge, they will have to pay—or go outside of permitted hours, before 9 a.m. or after 10 p.m. Some of the first tourists who encountered the new charge were annoyed and saw it as a simple revenue-generating measure. There are even Italians who believe that one shouldn't have to pay to see a public square, according to EFE. Others felt that at least they could approach the fountain without so much pushing and shoving. Rome's tourism councilor, Alessandro Onorato, assures that the new fee will generate at least six million euros annually. Onorato believes the measure is "a contribution of beauty and hospitality" and is convinced it won't be a deterrent: "If the Trevi Fountain were in New York, they would have asked for at least one hundred dollars, not two euros. But we'll have time to demonstrate that a smart balance can be struck between living in a place, living well, and ensuring that." The monument received approximately nine million visitors in 2025, about 30,000 people per day. To regulate this overcrowding, Rome has been increasing its entrance fees to attractions like the iconic Pantheon, which now costs 3-5 euros. Five municipal museums began charging admission this Monday. Reservations can be made online or at the ticket office everywhere. </p>]]></description>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[L. Serra]]></dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[https://en.ara.cat/culture/want-to-get-closer-to-the-trevi-fountain-it-s-two-euros_1_5636254.html]]></guid>
      <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Feb 2026 17:40:11 +0000]]></pubDate>
      <media:content url="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/9229ecb2-0e73-465d-80ee-8ea85cb9ecef_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg" type="image/jpeg"/>
      <media:title><![CDATA[One of the tourists who inaugurated the paid Trevi Fountain.]]></media:title>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://static1.ara.cat/clip/9229ecb2-0e73-465d-80ee-8ea85cb9ecef_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg"/>
      <subtitle><![CDATA[The measure aims to control overcrowding and raise more than 6 million euros per year]]></subtitle>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
