It is already known that the first victim of a war is truth and that, for governments, especially in times of war, doing journalism is unpatriotic because certain sensitive information cannot be revealed to the enemy. Media outlets always face this dilemma in times of war, as part of their readership may buy into this message, and therefore, the New York Times has been forced to educate its readers.

The main proof that things in Iran aren't going as Donald Trump planned is that in recent hours he has decided to attack the press because independent media outlets aren't buying his triumphalist narrative about the conflict. Trump doesn't like what he reads, and in a post on his social media he has directly targeted the press. New York Times and the Wall Street JournalTwo of the most prestigious media outlets in the United States are currently reporting in detail that the decision to attack Iran was made without considering its consequences, especially the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

On newsstands around the world this Tuesday the following headline could be read: "Separatists a Headache for Spain, Even From Jail". It is the front page of the New York Times, which dedicates one of the six main news items of the day to the president of Òmnium, Jordi Cuixart. On the inside pages, the three-paragraph box on the front page becomes an extensive interview with Cuixart in Lledoners prison. The headline asks: "Criminal or martyr? Prisoner Poses a Political Dilemma for Spain". And, in fact, Cuixart does not stop wondering aloud questions that can give an answer to his future: "At some point, Spain will have to ask itself: what do they want to do with me? Eliminate me? They can't," he concludes. Thus ends a report that reviews Cuixart's origins as well as the evolution of the Independence bid.