The murder of another person in Minneapolis, a victim of border patrol shootings, presents us with two simultaneous consequences: the American and the global. Granting impunity to a police force that only obeys its leader and persecutes immigrants without warrants or kills those who oppose it is all too similar to the Gestapo when it hunted down Jews and dissidents in 1930s Germany. Countries where the police kill their own people in cold blood in the street and then accuse them of terrorism are called dictatorships. The next step is imaginable: increase tension, provoke the people, accuse local authorities of insurrection, strip them of their constitutional powers, and, under the pretext of preventing riots or armed confrontations, suspend elections in the name of security and public order.

Murcia is once again taking center stage when it comes to migrant rights. Following the riots and racist attacks in Torre Pacheco, a motion by the PP and Vox in Jumilla City Council has set off alarm bells among the Islamic community, but also within the Church and the Spanish government. The council, in the hands of the Popular Party (PP), has just approved an amendment that opens the door to vetoing the collective prayer with which the Muslim community celebrates the end of Ramadan and the Feast of the Lamb. Pedro Sánchez's government has already said it will investigate, and the Spanish Episcopal Conference has denounced in a statement that restricting worship in public spaces is "a form of discrimination lacking in a democracy."

Rosa RR has been living in an apartment in the Buenos Aires neighborhood of Martorell for over three years, but the City Council is preventing her from registering because she has no property title or rental agreement. She has requested entry to the register up to six times and has not received a response in each case, although the law interprets this silence as positive after the required three months have passed. However, she is still not registered.

Neighbours knocked on Maria Ribas's door looking for advice from a woman who had already split amicably before there was a divorce. Her children, now well into their forties, remember how the dining room at home was occasionally turned into a consulting room for women who wanted to know what they would encounter if they dared to follow in her footsteps. "Back then it wasn't so normal to split or get divorced", says Ribas.

That feminism is not a homogeneous movement has been demonstrated, once again, with the leak of the draft of the Spanish trans law, which should allow a change of sex in the National Identity Card (DNI) only on request and without the need for a medical report of gender dysphoria or to undergo hormone treatment. In this way, transsexuality is depathologised, a historical demand of the collective. However, since Irene Moreno's Ministry of Equality announced the initiative, detractors and defenders have been at each other's throats, and gender self-determination is the main battle horse that pits the two sides against each other.

He has done it: he has confessed some facts that he has not committed. Worse still, he has undertaken to pay substantial compensation for the repair of the damage made to a police van that he has not damaged, and compensation for the injuries of an officer who fell while beating him to arrest him. This decision hurts in anyone's soul: to defend one's dignity and truth, or to give in and buy security. This confession will swell the poisoned statistics that tomorrow will be used to show that the system works: police forces write up statements, the prosecution and private prosecutors hold up charges based on these statements, and finally a sentence is passed that closes the circle and validates the whole gear. Once the agreement is closed, a trial will be held. This trial is reduced to a bargain: the accusations reduce the penalty to ensure the accused person does not enter prison, in exchange for admitting the facts and the penalty. Our confession will serve to show that the police officers arrested the right person, that the prosecution and the other charges also charged the right person, and that the sentence has convicted the right person. What is clearer than a confession, to show that someone is guilty?